CA1中标公示内容：
项目名称：(略)
Project Name：(略)
招标编号：(略)
Bid No.：(略)
招标人：(略)
Employer：(略)
招标代理：(略)
Procurement Agent：(略)
参与投标的企业以及各自的投标价格及评标价格为：

编号 No.	投标人名称 Bidders’ Name	投标报价（人民币） Bid Price (CNY)	评标价（人民币） Evaluated Bid Price (CNY)	排名 Rank
1	云南玉溪路桥工程有限责任公司Yunnan Yuxi Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	/	/
2	辽宁交通建设集团有限公司Liaoning Traffic Construction Group Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	(略),(略),(略).(略)	1
3	昭通先行道路桥梁工程公司Zhaotong First Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	/	/
4	曲靖公路桥梁工程公司 Qujing Highway and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	/	/

经过评标委员会综合评审，云南玉溪路桥工程有限责任公司、昭通先行道路桥梁工程公司和曲靖公路桥梁工程公司是业主的附属企业，不满足招标文件投标人须知4.5款中规定的国有企业合格性要求，因此，对这三家公司的投标作废标处理。只有辽宁交通建设集团有限公司满足招标文件的商务和技术要求，且其评标价最低，因此被评标委员会推荐为中标人，中标价为人民币(略),(略),(略).(略)元。
Based on systematic evaluation of the Bid Evaluation Committee, Yunnan Yuxi Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd., Zhaotong First Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd. and Qujing Highway and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd. are subordinate agents of the Employer, which cannot meet the SOE eligibility requirement stated in ITB Sub-clause 4.5 of the bidding document, as a result, their bids are rejected. Only Liaoning Traffic Construction Group Co., Ltd. is substantially responsive (commercial part and technical part) to the requirements of the bidding documents and it had the lowest evaluated bid price. Therefore, it was recommended that the contract will be awarded to Liaoning Traffic Construction Group Co., Ltd. The proposed contract amount is RMB (略),(略),(略).(略) yuan.
公示日期：(略)
Publication Period：(略)
CA2中标公示内容：
项目名称：(略)
Project Name：(略)
招标编号：(略)
Bid No.：(略)
招标人：(略)
Employer：(略)
招标代理：(略)
Procurement Agent：(略)
参与投标的企业以及各自的投标价格及评标价格为：

编号 No.	投标人名称 Bidders’ Name	投标报价（人民币） Bid Price (CNY)	评标价（人民币） Evaluated Bid Price (CNY)	排名 Rank
1	重庆川东路桥工程有限公司Chongqing ChuanDong Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	(略),(略),(略).(略)	1
2	云南省文山道路桥梁工程公司Yunnan Wenshan Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	/	/
3	昭通先行道路桥梁工程公司Zhaotong First Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	/	/
4	曲靖公路桥梁工程公司 Qujing Highway and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	/	/

经过评标委员会综合评审，云南省文山道路桥梁工程公司、昭通先行道路桥梁工程公司和曲靖公路桥梁工程公司是业主的附属企业，不满足招标文件投标人须知4.5款中规定的国有企业合格性要求，因此，对这三家公司的投标作废标处理。只有重庆川东路桥工程有限公司满足招标文件的商务和技术要求，且其评标价最低，因此被评标委员会推荐为中标人，中标价为人民币(略),(略),(略).(略)元。
Based on systematic evaluation of the Bid Evaluation Committee, Yunnan Wenshan Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd., Zhaotong First Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd. and Qujing Highway and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd. are subordinate agents of the Employer, which cannot meet the SOE eligibility requirement stated in ITB Sub-clause 4.5 of the bidding document, as a result, their bids are rejected. Only Chongqing ChuanDong Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd. is substantially responsive (commercial part and technical part) to the requirements of the bidding documents and it had the lowest evaluated bid price. Therefore, it was recommended that the contract will be awarded to Chongqing ChuanDong Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd. The proposed contract amount is RMB (略),(略),(略).(略) yuan.
公示日期：(略)
Publication Period：(略)
CA3中标公示内容：
项目名称：(略)
Project Name：(略)
招标编号：(略)
Bid No.：(略)
招标人：(略)
Employer：(略)
招标代理：(略)
Procurement Agent：(略)
参与投标的企业以及各自的投标价格及评标价格为：

编号 No.	投标人名称 Bidders’ Name	投标报价（人民币） Bid Price (CNY)	评标价（人民币） Evaluated Bid Price (CNY)	排名 Rank
1	云南德宏道路桥梁工程有限公司Yunnan Dehong Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	/	/
2	重庆市实力公路开发有限公司Chongqing ShiLi Highway Development Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	(略),(略),(略).(略)	1
3	云南玉溪路桥工程有限责任公司Yunnan Yuxi Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	/	/
4	云南丽江道路桥梁工程公司Yunnan Lijiang Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	/	/

经过评标委员会综合评审，（1）云南丽江道路桥梁工程公司根据过去3年里（(略)-(略)）年均施工营业额不满足招标文件第三章-评标和资格标准2.3财务状况规定的最低要求，未通过资格审查。（2）云南德宏道路桥梁工程有限公司、云南玉溪路桥工程有限责任公司和云南丽江道路桥梁工程公司是业主的附属企业，不满足招标文件投标人须知4.5款中规定的国有企业合格性要求，因此，对这三家公司的投标作废标处理。只有重庆市实力公路开发有限公司满足招标文件的商务和技术要求，且其评标价最低，因此被评标委员会推荐为中标人，中标价为人民币(略),(略),(略).(略) 元。
Based on systematic evaluation of the Bid Evaluation Committee, (1) the Average Annual construction Turnover of Yunnan Lijiang Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd. did not meet the requirement of bidding documents; (2) Yunnan Dehong Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd., Yunnan Yuxi Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd. and Yunnan Lijiang Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd. are subordinate agents of the Employer, which cannot meet the SOE eligibility requirement stated in ITB Sub-clause 4.5 of the bidding document; as a result, bids from the above said 3 bidders are rejected. Only Chongqing ShiLi Highway Development Co., Ltd. is substantially responsive (commercial part and technical part) to the requirements of the bidding documents and it had the lowest evaluated bid price. Therefore, it was recommended that the contract will be awarded to Chongqing ShiLi Highway Development Co., Ltd. The proposed contract amount is RMB (略),(略),(略).(略) yuan.
公示日期：(略)
Publication Period：(略)
CA4中标公示内容：
项目名称：(略)
Project Name：(略)
招标编号：(略)
Bid No.：(略)
招标人：(略)
Employer：(略)
招标代理：(略)
Procurement Agent：(略)
参与投标的企业以及各自的投标价格及评标价格为：

编号 No.	投标人名称 Bidders’ Name	投标报价（人民币） Bid Price (CNY)	评标价（人民币） Evaluated Bid Price (CNY)	排名 Rank
1	江西赣红路桥工程有限公司Jiangxi Gan Hong Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	(略),(略),(略).(略)	1
2	安徽鸿宇路桥工程有限公司Anhui Hongyu Road and Bridge Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	(略),(略),(略).(略)	2
3	大理道路桥梁工程公司 Dali Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	/	/
4	云南临沧公路桥梁工程总公司Yunnan Lincang Highway Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	/	/
5	西双版纳锦程公路桥梁工程有限公司 Xishuangbanna Jincheng Highway Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	/	/
6	云南普洱道路桥梁工程公司 Yunnan Pu'er Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	/	/

经过评标委员会综合评审，大理道路桥梁工程公司、云南临沧公路桥梁工程总公司、西双版纳锦程公路桥梁工程有限公司和云南普洱道路桥梁工程公司是业主的附属企业，不满足招标文件投标人须知4.5款中规定的国有企业合格性要求，因此，对这四家公司的投标作废标处理。江西赣红路桥工程有限公司、安徽鸿宇路桥工程有限公司满足招标文件的商务和技术要求。其中，江西赣红路桥工程有限公司评标价最低，因此被评标委员会推荐为中标人，中标价为人民币(略),(略),(略).(略) 元。
Based on systematic evaluation of the Bid Evaluation Committee, Dali Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd., Yunnan Lincang Highway Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd., Xishuangbanna Jincheng Highway Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd. and Yunnan Pu'er Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd. are subordinate agents of the Employer, which cannot meet the SOE eligibility requirement stated in ITB Sub-clause 4.5 of the bidding document, as a result, the abovementioned 4 bids are rejected. Jiangxi Gan Hong Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd. and Anhui Hongyu Road and Bridge Co., Ltd. are substantially responsive (commercial part and technical part) to the requirements of the bidding documents. Further, Jiangxi Gan Hong Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd. had the lowest evaluated bid price. Therefore, it was recommended that the contract will be awarded to Jiangxi Gan Hong Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd. The proposed contract amount is RMB (略),(略),(略).(略) yuan.
公示日期：(略)
Publication Period：(略)
CA5中标公示内容：
项目名称：(略)
Project Name：(略)
招标编号：(略)
Bid No.：(略)
招标人：(略)
Employer：(略)
招标代理：(略)
Procurement Agent：(略)
参与投标的企业以及各自的投标价格及评标价格为：

编号 No.	投标人名称 Bidders’ Name	投标报价（人民币） Bid Price (CNY)	评标价（人民币） Evaluated Bid Price (CNY)	排名 Rank
1	云南宝力恒建设工程有限公司Yunnan Baoliheng Construction Engineering Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	(略),(略),(略).(略)	1
2	云南保山道路桥梁工程公司Yunnan Baoshan Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	/	/
3	云南丽江道路桥梁工程公司Yunnan Lijiang Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	/	/
4	云南德宏道路桥梁工程有限公司Yunnan Dehong Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd.	(略),(略),(略).(略)	/	/

经过评标委员会综合评审，云南保山道路桥梁工程公司、云南丽江道路桥梁工程公司和云南德宏道路桥梁工程有限公司是业主的附属企业，不满足招标文件投标人须知4.5款中规定的国有企业合格性要求，因此，对这三家公司的投标作废标处理。只有云南宝力恒建设工程有限公司满足招标文件的商务和技术要求，且其评标价最低，因此被评标委员会推荐为中标人，中标价为人民币(略),(略),(略).(略)元。
Based on systematic evaluation of the Bid Evaluation Committee, Yunnan Baoshan Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd., Yunnan Lijiang Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd. and Yunnan Dehong Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd. are subordinate agents of the Employer, which cannot meet the SOE eligibility requirement stated in ITB Sub-clause 4.5 of the bidding document, as a result, their bids are rejected. Only Yunnan Baoliheng Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. is substantially responsive (commercial part and technical part) to the requirements of the bidding documents and it had the lowest evaluated bid price. Therefore, it was recommended that the contract will be awarded to Yunnan Baoliheng Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. The proposed contract amount is RMB (略),(略),(略).(略) yuan.
公示日期：(略)
Publication Period：(略)
附件：(略)